Robert Kendrick vs Tyler Cleveland Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
L L W L L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Kendrick 1 - 1 Cleveland
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kendrick winning 2 and Cleveland winning 1. The last match between Kendrick and Cleveland was at the AT&T Challenger of Dallas - Dallas, 07-02-2007, Second, I.hard with Robert Kendrick getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Robert Kendrick | 1 |
| Tyler Cleveland | 1 |
AT&T Challenger of Dallas - Dallas(07-02-2007)
7
6
6
3
| Kendrick | Stats | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 69 | Highest Rank | 336 |
| 45 | Age | 46 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (403-289) | Career Total W/L | 55% (67-54) |
| $340,565 | Career Prize Money | $1,000 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 7-6 ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Robert Kendrick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Robert Kendrick
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Robert Kendrick
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
46
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Robert Kendrick
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robert Kendrick
Player
Matthias Bachinger
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Kendrick
Player
Daniel Smethurst
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Levine
Player
Robert Kendrick
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robert Kendrick
Player
Stephane Bohli
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
30 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Benjamin Becker
Player
Robert Kendrick
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
22
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
39 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
22 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robert Kendrick
Player
Igor Kunitsyn
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tyler Cleveland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wesley Whitehouse
Player
Tyler Cleveland
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
77 of
102)
12
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
4
86%
(
44 of
51)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
62 of
77)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
27 of
102)
93
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(6) 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-7(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (403/289) | Win/Loss | 55% (67/54) |
| 56% (922/731) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (152/127) |
| 52% (8416/7709) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1410/1299) |
| 59% (252/175) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (44/33) |
| 45% (35/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (11/9) |
| 65% (84/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (12/12) |
| 54% (32/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 1659 | Aces Total | 45 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 674 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 570.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 470.93 |
| 59% (8115/13840) | 1st Serve % | 67% (286/424) |
| 75% (6108/8115) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (209/286) |
| 49% (2794/5730) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (71/138) |
| 39% (416/1077) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (6/26) |
| 36% (4885/13737) | Return Points Win % | 31% (119/390) |
| 51% (33/32) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (20/21) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (74/74) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (273/159) | Challenger W/L | 56% (38/30) |
| 50% (3/3) | Futures W/L | 57% (27/20) |
| 60% (393/658) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (66/118) |
| 24% (6/25) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (132/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 57% (137/239) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 85% (390/332) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (64/56) |
| 15% (390/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (64/8) |
| 24% (302/71) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (57/11) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
